Scarcity: Behavioral Responses to Institutional Shortcomings in Guatemala’s Public Sector

Authors

  • Andrea Monterroso Centro de Investigaciones Económicas Nacionales (CIEN), Guatemala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55614/27093824.v8i1.237

Keywords:

cognitive, scarcity, behavioral economics, public sector, institutional adaptation, human agency, public policy

Abstract

Scarcity is usually understood as a shortage of material resources, but its deepest dimension is of a cognitive and human nature. Drawing on behavioral economics, this article examines how constraints on time, attention and institutional structure influence decision-making and the agency of public sector workers. Based on experiences in Guatemalan state institutions, this article analyzes three manifestations of scarcity: the reduction of cognitive bandwidth, the creation of adaptive systems of institutional survival, and purpose-drive prosocial action. These responses show that the mind under scarcity not only faces shortages but also generates solutions that sustain the public mission. The text proposes conceiving scarcity as a starting point for deliberation and action, rather than merely as an obstacle, and argues that freeing up attention can be an institutional strategy to expand freedom and strengthen the civil service.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Andrea Monterroso, Centro de Investigaciones Económicas Nacionales (CIEN), Guatemala

    Politóloga guatemalteca con experiencia en investigación, docencia universitaria y trabajo en instituciones públicas. Ha colaborado en proyectos sobre modernización estatal, gobernanza digital y análisis institucional en el Centro de Investigaciones Económicas Nacionales (CIEN) y en el Banco Mundial. Le interesa entender cómo las personas toman decisiones y cómo los contextos influyen en su comportamiento. Actualmente explora la relación entre economía del comportamiento y políticas públicas.

References

Leontjeva, E., Vainé, A. y Vyšniauskaitė, M. (2023). The Phenomenon of Scarcity: Being, Man and Community [El fenómeno de la escasez: El ser, el hombre y la comunidad]. Lithuanian Free Market Institute.

Mullainathan, S. y Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much [La escasez: Por qué tener muy poco significa tanto]. Times Books.

Robbins, L. (1932). An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science [Ensayo sobre la naturaleza y la importancia de la ciencia económica]. Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Thaler, R. H. y Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness [Un pequeño empujón: El impulso que necesitas para tomar mejores decisiones sobre salud, dinero y felicidad]. Yale University Press.

Samuelson, P. A. y Nordhaus, W. D. (2010). Economics [Economía]. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom [El desarrollo como libertad]. Alfred A. Knopf.

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

Scarcity: Behavioral Responses to Institutional Shortcomings in Guatemala’s Public Sector. (2026). Revista Fe Y Libertad, 8(1), 229-235. https://doi.org/10.55614/27093824.v8i1.237

Similar Articles

1-10 of 93

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.